Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Thwarting Control-Channel Jamming Attacks from Inside Jammers


NANO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CENTRE PVT.LTD.,  AMEERPET, HYD
WWW.NSRCNANO.COM, 09640648777, 09652926926



DOT NET PROJECTS LIST--2013
 DOT NET 2013 IEEE PAPERS

Thwarting Control-Channel Jamming
Attacks from Inside Jammers
ABSTRACT:
                Coordination of network functions in wireless networks requires frequent exchange of control messages among participating nodes. Typically, such messages are transmitted over a universally known communication channel referred to as the control channel. Due to its critical role, this channel can become a prime target of Denial-of-Service (DOS) attacks. In this paper, we address the problem of preventing control-channel DOS attacks manifested in the form of jamming. We consider a sophisticated adversary who has knowledge of the protocol specifics and of the cryptographic quantities used to secure network operations. This type of adversary cannot be prevented by anti jamming techniques that rely on shared secrets, such as spread spectrum. We propose new security metrics to quantify the ability of the adversary to deny access to the control channel, and introduce a randomized distributed scheme that allows nodes to establish and maintain the control channel in the presence of the jammer. Our method is
applicable to networks with static or dynamically allocated spectrum. Furthermore, we propose two algorithms for unique identification of the set of compromised nodes, one for independently acting nodes and one for colluding nodes. Detailed theoretical evaluation of the security metrics and extensive simulation results are provided to demonstrate the efficiency of our methods in mitigating jamming and identifying compromised nodes.

EXISTING SYSTEM:
            A collection of nodes into a wireless network requires cooperative implementation of critical network functions such as neighbor discovery, channel access and assignment, routing, and time synchronization. These functions are coordinated by exchanging messages on a broadcast channel, known as the control channel. In most network architectures, including mobile ad hoc, vehicular, sensor, cellular, mesh, and cognitive radio networks (CRNs), the location1 of the control channel, determined by its frequency band, time slot, or spreading code, is known a priori to all nodes participating in the network, From a security standpoint, operating over a globally known control channel constitutes a single point of failure. Networks deployed in hostile environments are susceptible to Denial-of-Service (DOS) attacks by adversaries targeting
the functionality of the control channel . If the adversary is successful, network service can be denied even if other available frequency bands remain operational. One of the most effective ways for denying access to the control channel is by jamming it. In this attack, the adversary
interferes with the frequency band(s) used for control by transmitting a continuous jamming signal , or several short jamming pulses. Typically, jamming attacks have been analyzed and
addressed as a physical-layer vulnerability. Conventional anti jamming techniques rely extensively on spread spectrum. These techniques provide bit-level protection by spreading bits according to a secret PN code, known only to the communicating parties. An adversary unaware
of this code has to transmit with a power which is several orders of magnitude higher compared to the SS transmission,  in order to corrupt a SS signal. However, in packet radio networks, corrupting a few more bits than the correction capability of the error correcting code (ECC)
(about 13 percent of the packet length for WLANs) is sufficient to force the dropping of a data packet. Hence, the adversary need only stay active for a fraction of the time required for a packet transmission. Moreover, targeting the control channel, which typically operates at a low transmission rate, significantly reduces the adversary’s effort. In fact, it was shown that the power required to perform a DOS attack in GSM networks is reduced by several orders of magnitude when the attack targets the control channel ,Moreover, potential disclosure of cryptographic secrets (e.g., PN codes) by compromised nodes further reduces the adversary’s effort. Note that because control information is broadcasted, PN codes must be shared by all intended receivers. The compromise of a single receiver leaves the network vulnerable to low-effort jamming attacks.

PROPOSED SYSTEM:
            We consider a sophisticated adversary who exploits knowledge of protocol specifications
along with cryptographic secrets to efficiently jam the control channel. This channel can be used by any layer in the protocol stack to broadcast control traffic, which could include coordination information needed for protocol operation in upper layers. To quantify the adversary’s ability to deny access to the control channel, new security metrics are defined. A randomized distributed channel establishment and maintenance scheme is developed to allow nodes to establish a new control channel using frequency hopping. Under our scheme, network nodes are able to temporarily access a control channel until the jammer is removed from the network. Our method differs from classic frequency hopping in that no two nodes share the same hopping sequence. This allows for unique identification of compromised nodes by nearby ones. Our scheme is suitable for networks with static or dynamic spectrum assignment (e.g., CRNs). For the latter, we
propose a modification of the original scheme to take into account the dynamic nature of channel availability in time and space. Assuming perfect random number generators, we analytically evaluate the proposed anti jamming metrics. We verify our analytic results via extensive simulations. Both static spectrum and dynamic spectrum networks are considered and simulated.


HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS

Operating System: Windows XP (Service Pack 3)
Processor: Pentium iV
RAM: 1GB
Working Background: Visual Studio 2010
Language: C#

MODULES
·         Server Module
·         Client Module
·         Jammer Removal Module


No comments:

Post a Comment